|
|||||||
|
The Earl Arran Conservative said in his reply "That a limited number of people have heard in 'general terms' that the United States authorities had found evidence that suggested the use of 'humans' in such experiments" But no prisoners of war! A tacit agreement that we were aware that such evidence was available, and that we have evidence of a war crime. From one extreme to the other. The time between these two statements, a mere 5 YEARS. More than enough time to examine just what they had, and to destroy any suggestion of evidence that might embarrass past and future Ministers of Defence. What did he mean by 'General Terms' ? What was the evidence that changed their minds, and mine?
|
And just who was Col. Padget--(British BW Representative).1 copy referred to in the document, none other than Sir Bernard Charles Tolver PAGET, GCB, DSO, MC, aide-de-camp, Military Intelligence. Oxford and Bucks Light Infantry, British Army. Note there is the reference to the fact that "information of similar BW nature is regularly made" So this was not a one off example, but a series of reports regularly made between the Tri-partite nations Brittan Canada and the USA that we have had in place since before the Second World War and ratified in 1946. I then asked if it were possible to obtain a copy of this report here in Britain, to a Member of Parliament Sir Jack Ashley, a man who's integrity and veracity is above question. Both he and Sir Bernard Braine MP, asked if they could see it on 'Privy Council' terms. 6th January 1990, Sir Bernard Braine, letter to George Younger MP Conservative Minister of Defence "However you indicated that there were certain documents held in the public records office which are not open to the public examination and are closed for specific periods in excess of the normal 30years. I think I should tell you I am asking Geoffrey Howe if I can see these documents on Privy Councillors Terms?" |
||||||
|
|
||||||
